
I’m reading Lee Strobel’s Case For Faith at the moment. I picked it up quite by “chance” in my Pastor’s library the other day as he was discussing football with my companion and I lost interest so looked at his library instead. It piqued my interest because I’ve read his other book Case For Christ which is one of the more satisfying books on Christian apologetics I’ve encountered.
I had gone off apologetics for a little while, mostly because I find that very often the discussions with atheists are too emotionally charged and end up being more abusive than truth seeking, and anyway I have enough to do just trying to be like Jesus in a practical sense. However, my recent encounter with Matt, who is now an atheist (of the less vehement sort) but used to be a believer, stirred things up a little.
So I thought I’d take a look at Hell as a gentle warmup.
The objection is simply stated: How can the concept of Hell be reconciled with a supposedly loving God?
In other words, if God is loving, how can he have created a place so awful as Hell and punish for eternity a finite number of sins? There are other related questions but I’ll focus on these for now.
An awful place?
Hell is usually imagined to be a place of fire and brimstone, full of vile, cackling demons with pitch forks torturing screaming victims. Some of this imagery is also in the New Testament, but I think it is fair to say that these are images, figures of speech, not necessarily a reflection of the underlying reality. For example, the term for Hell often used in the New Testament is Gehenna, which was the garbage dump outside Jerusalem, a place of fire, smoke, stench, filth and worms. Can you image the affect of this image on the jews of the day? Hell is also described as a place of darkness, which cannot be if its permanently lit up with flames.
So if it is not like this then what sort of place is it? Is it even a place? I don’t know, but what is clear is that it will be separated from God, both by His choice and by the choices of those who didn’t want Him in the first place – a realm of evil without any of His restraint, any of His love. God has to by nature maintain a separation between pure good and evil. How could an infinitely holy God tolerate the presence of evil? The reason that Hell is so bad is that it is all that God isn’t. But in many senses this is a self-made Hell. If you don’t want God, He grants you your wish. Does He like Hell? No, definitely not. Did He create it? Yes, but probably as a result of the fall, not the original creation which He declared was “good”. Hell is a sad but necessary consequence of Free Will.
As for those who are genuinely misguided in their beliefs I think there is enough circumstancial evidence in the Bible to grant that at worst their suffering will be diminished, but at best that God will grant mercy to the innocent.
Excessive?
Is eternity in Hell for a finite number of sins unjust? The argument usually presented here is as follows:
Punishment for wrong is just, so no problems there. Punishment for wrong against an infinitely good God is infinitely bad, so infinite punishment follows. This combined with the above view that Hell is more a place of our making than a place of active punishment, resolves things enough for me.
I’ll leave it there for now. The book is excellent and to be recommended if you want a more detailed (and vastly improved) treatment of this subject than I can offer here.
5 Comments